Talk on 'Development Conflicts We Know Nothing of'

Talk on 'Development Conflicts We Know Nothing of'
Rohit Prasad
Thursday, 20 April 2017 Add to Calendar 2017-04-20 15:00:00 2017-04-20 16:30:00 Asia/Kolkata Talk on 'Development Conflicts We Know Nothing of' This talk is based on the book Blood Red River published in June 2016 by Hachette. The typical narrative of development conflict is of a rapacious industry that is unwilling to share the gains of development with people affected by projects and, instead, prone to paying off politicians, bureaucrats and police officers to get achieve ‘compliance’ with the law of the land on land acquisition and environment.  Many conflicts I observed can be fitted into this model, for instance, the conflict between the CSR Manager, eager, to do the right thing, and the line manager, focussed on his key performance metrics. However there are two important relationships that run contrary to this narrative of development conflict. One is the nature of the conflict between members of the development elite – industrialists who stand to gain from industrialization. These industrialists, driven by their egos, business imperatives, and even family feuds, target their fellow industrialists with methods foul and fair. They often adopt the violent methods of insurgents while at the same time laying the blame on them. Such operations are usually outsourced to contractors who are also backed by pliant politicians, bureaucrats and members of the police force. The second conflict that we usually ignore is that between the global and the national elite. This is a more subtle conflict that is carried out through a series of actions of bodies like the Federal Reserve of the USA, the IMF, and the World Bank, that protect the recession prone economies of the advanced economies through activities like monetary expansion, without considering the possible consequences on the emerging economies. This leads to the national elite getting tethered to the rise and ebb of the global commodities cycle, making them appear visionary and blundering in turn, without any real cause for either opinion.  Further, many dichotomies of development are in fact, spurious. One of these dichotomies relates to the conflict between the welfare of the poor and the protection of the environment – forests, rivers, and wildlife. Many people feel outraged that environmentalists want to protest the environment against industrialization. ‘Think of the many poor people who could benefit,’ they argue. However, the day to day life of  adivasis (dalits and other lower castes)  described in the book shows that the adivasi spends half their working day on the field and half in the forest foraging for fruits, fodder and wood. Therefore the depletion of the environment directly takes away half their livelihoods. The acquisition of agricultural land takes away the other half. And the increasing capital intensity of mining and industrial production, overall, results in there being nothing to substitute the loss of livelihood.  Solutions will be proposed including  a. Decoupling the mining industry ... Conference Hall, Centre for Policy Research
3:00 pm to 4:30 pm
Conference Hall, Centre for Policy Research
RELATED PROJECT:

This talk is based on the book Blood Red River published in June 2016 by Hachette.

The typical narrative of development conflict is of a rapacious industry that is unwilling to share the gains of development with people affected by projects and, instead, prone to paying off politicians, bureaucrats and police officers to get achieve ‘compliance’ with the law of the land on land acquisition and environment. 

Many conflicts I observed can be fitted into this model, for instance, the conflict between the CSR Manager, eager, to do the right thing, and the line manager, focussed on his key performance metrics. However there are two important relationships that run contrary to this narrative of development conflict. One is the nature of the conflict between members of the development elite – industrialists who stand to gain from industrialization. These industrialists, driven by their egos, business imperatives, and even family feuds, target their fellow industrialists with methods foul and fair. They often adopt the violent methods of insurgents while at the same time laying the blame on them. Such operations are usually outsourced to contractors who are also backed by pliant politicians, bureaucrats and members of the police force.

The second conflict that we usually ignore is that between the global and the national elite. This is a more subtle conflict that is carried out through a series of actions of bodies like the Federal Reserve of the USA, the IMF, and the World Bank, that protect the recession prone economies of the advanced economies through activities like monetary expansion, without considering the possible consequences on the emerging economies. This leads to the national elite getting tethered to the rise and ebb of the global commodities cycle, making them appear visionary and blundering in turn, without any real cause for either opinion. 

Further, many dichotomies of development are in fact, spurious. One of these dichotomies relates to the conflict between the welfare of the poor and the protection of the environment – forests, rivers, and wildlife. Many people feel outraged that environmentalists want to protest the environment against industrialization. ‘Think of the many poor people who could benefit,’ they argue. However, the day to day life of  adivasis (dalits and other lower castes)  described in the book shows that the adivasi spends half their working day on the field and half in the forest foraging for fruits, fodder and wood. Therefore the depletion of the environment directly takes away half their livelihoods. The acquisition of agricultural land takes away the other half. And the increasing capital intensity of mining and industrial production, overall, results in there being nothing to substitute the loss of livelihood. 

Solutions will be proposed including  a. Decoupling the mining industry from the global commodities cycle.  b. Evolving a regionally  balanced pattern of national growth that locates downstream industries close to sources of minerals. C. Ensuring development of education and health in mineral rich areas  in advance of industrialization to ensure gains from industrialization accrue to the inhabitants.

Structural aspects of the world economy that offer hope for inclusive development will be highlighted.

Rohit Prasad is a Professor of Economics at MDI Gurgaon. He has a Ph.D. in Economic Theory from SUNY Stony Brook, USA where he was taught Game Theory by the Nobel Laureate Professor Robert Aumann. His thesis written under the supervision of Prof. Pradeep Dubey, Leading Professor at SUNY-Stony Brook, provides a framework to address questions related to the optimal fiscal and monetary policy choices of a government in a free market. After his Ph.D. he worked in the software industry in USA and India in senior management positions before joining MDI Gurgaon. His last position was Vice President at Xansa, then a USD 700 million firm. His research interests include the economics of ICT¸ and sustainable development. His papers have been published at leading international journals including Telecommunications Policy and Netnomics. He writes a fortnightly column based on game theory called 'Game Sutra' in the Mint.  His book The Dynamics of Spectrum Management co-authored with Dr. V. Sridhar was published by the Oxford University Press in 2014. He is the author of a popular book on entrepreneurship, Startup Sutra and a travelogue that explores development conflict in India, Blood Red River, both published by Hachette. He recently served on a high powered Committee of the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India to make recommendations on spectrum allocation and pricing in India, and on two Expert Panels for the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India to study the value of 2G spectrum. He has provided expert testimony for a major telecom operator on spectrum related judicial proceedings.

Please RSVP at this link.


This is the seventh in a series of guest speaker talks organised by the CPR Land Rights Initiative to showcase perspectives on land rights issues by diverse stakeholders, including academics from various disciplinary backgrounds, civil society organisations, grassroots activists, and policymakers. The goal of these talks is to generate multi-dimensional and multi-stakeholder knowledge on these issues.