ThoughtSpace Episode 4: Analysing the evolving India-China relations

A CONVERSATION BETWEEN SENIOR FELLOW SHYAM SARAN AND RICHA BANSAL
PODCAST INTERNATIONAL POLITICS

Relations between India and China have changed considerably over the past decade as China’s growth rate outpaced India’s, placing both countries in unique and different positions in the current global geopolitical context.

This has been most evident in recent times with China’s open opposition to India’s NSG membership bid; its blocking India’s move to ban Masood Azhar; and pledging large aid packages to other South Asian countries at the recent BRICS summit. India, on the other hand, has grown increasingly closer to the US; attempted to take on China over the South China sea dispute; and not shied away from a muscular response to terrorism emanating from Pakistani soil, notwithstanding China’s proximity to Pakistan. Add to this Donald Trump’s victory in the recent US elections and what this posits for the future.

In the fourth episode (above) of CPR’s podcast, ThoughtSpace, Richa Bansal talks to Shyam Saran, a Senior Fellow at CPR and a career diplomat, who is a respected authority on India-China relations, on the evolving India-China relations and what the future holds.

ThoughtSpace Episode 48: How to regulate India’s economy to enable growth

PODCAST FEATURING DR KP KRISHNAN AND YAMINI AIYAR

Listen to episode 48 of ThoughtSpace featuring Dr KP Krishnan and Yamini Aiyar.

As we debate the future of the Indian economy, the issue of regulation has emerged consistently as a crucial fault line. How does India design regulatory systems in ways that are effective, constrains capital where needed, but at the same time builds markets, enables the unleashing of animal spirits, and protects labour and citizens? These are critical roles the state is meant to play, but given India’s complex regulatory system, it has been argued that the only way ahead for India is to rid ourselves of the regulatory cholesterol to unleash animal spirits and build the Indian economy. In such a scenario, what ought to be the role of the state in building regulatory institutions and mediating the relationship between capital and labour?

In this episode, Yamini Aiyar, President & Chief Executive of CPR, speaks with Dr KP Krishnan, Professor at the National Council of Applied Economic Research and former IAS officer. Dr Krishnan sheds light on the difference between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ regulatory cholesterol, shares examples of positive financial regulation by the state, and calls for participatory processes in the design of regulation.

For more information on the centre’s work, follow CPR on Twitter @CPR_India or visit www.cprindia.org. You can read more on TeamLease’s work on India’s compliance regime and regulatory cholesterol here and here.

ThoughtSpace Episode 5: Demonetisation–curbing black money or welfare shock?

A CONVERSATION BETWEEN SENIOR FELLOW DR RAJIV KUMAR AND RICHA BANSAL
PODCAST ECONOMY

On the night of November 8, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the withdrawal of 500 and 1000 rupee notes from the market, with immediate effect, with the aim of curbing black money. While this move at demonetisation was hailed with great enthusiasm when announced, the euphoria soon gave way to frustration, anger and resentment, as the ‘inconvenience’ faced by people continued to mount with banks and ATMs running out of the new notes.

Is the move worth the trouble people are going through? How will those in the informal economy cope? Will the micro overshadow the macro? What are the larger benefits? How are things likely to unfold, going forward?

In the fifth episode (above) of CPR’s podcast, ThoughtSpace, Richa Bansal talks to Dr Rajiv Kumar, a well-known economist and Senior Fellow at CPR, to deconstruct the debate on demonetisation more deeply, moving beyond the binaries.

ThoughtSpace Episode 6: Pakistan’s New Army Chief Qamar Javed Bajwa & India

A CONVERSATION BETWEEN AMBASSADOR G PARTHSARATHY AND RICHA BANSAL
INDIA-PAKISTAN PODCAST SOUTH ASIA

The India-Pakistan relationship has been at an all-time low since the Uri attack, with India closely watching the change in guard of the Pakistani army chief, the de-facto power centre there. With the replacement of Raheel Sharif with General Qamar Javed Bajwa last week, who is known to be pro-democracy, a new equation is expected to take shape between the two countries, and the larger geopolitical scenario is also likely to be impacted.

In the sixth episode (above) of CPR’s podcast, ThoughtSpace, Richa Bansal talks to Ambassador G Parthsarathy, a career diplomat and Honorary Research professor at CPR, who has also been the High Commissioner of India to Pakistan, to understand what General Qamar Javed Bajwa’s appointment as the new Army Chief of Pakistan means for India and the region at large.

ThoughtSpace Episode 9: India’s New Education Policy in Waiting for Three Decades

A CONVERSATION BETWEEN SENIOR FELLOW KIRAN BHATTY AND RICHA BANSAL
EDUCATION RIGHTS PODCAST

The government of India is working to bring out a New Education Policy or NEP to meet the needs of a changing India, ensuring quality, innovation, research to make the country a knowledge hub. The draft NEP, which was formulated under the regime of the previous HRD Minister Smriti Irani now lies in a state of flux since the change of guard, and there is a possibility that it could be revisited completely under a new committee.

As India waits for a New Education Policy, which hasn’t been revised for over three decades now, and is critical to address the gaps in the existing public education system, in the ninth episode of CPR’s podcast ThoughtSpace (above), Richa Bansal talks to Kiran Bhatty, a Senior Fellow at CPR and one of the experts consulted during the formulation of the first draft, to understand where we stand and what needs to be done.

ThoughtSpace: Podcast on Understanding Reservations for Economically Backward Sections of Society

A CONVERSATION BETWEEN D SHYAM BABU AND RICHA BANSAL
PODCAST IDENTITY DISCRIMINATION POLITICS

Listen to the full CPR podcast, ThoughtSpace (above) featuring Senior Fellow, D Shyam Babu, where he discusses the Lok Sabha bill that aims to provide 10 percent reservation in government jobs and education to the economically backward section in the general category.

Through the amendment of Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution, the bill seeks to allow states to make ‘special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizens’.

In an article in ‘Times of India’, D Shyam Babu questioned whether ‘one should treat the exercise as a bold attempt at social reform, or as a cynical politics of divide and rule?’ Shedding light on the ironies of the policy, he highlighted that ‘the same social groups who ridiculed the quota system as ‘vote-bank politics’ have now become the recipients of quota benefits.’

ThoughtSpace: Right to Sanitation in India – Critical Perspectives

PODCAST IN COLLABORATION WITH OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS AND BLOG ON NEW BOOK BY PHILIPPE CULLET, SUJITH KOONAN AND LOVLEEN BHULLAR

 

Listen to the full episode of the CPR podcast, ThoughtSpace (above), featuring Senior Visiting Fellow, Philippe Cullet, about the book, ‘Right to Sanitation: Critical Perspectives’ co-edited by him, Sujith Koonan and Lovleen Bhullar, published by Oxford University Press. The book represents the first effort to conceptually engage with the right to sanitation and its multiple dimensions in India, as well as its broader international and comparative setting. This episode of ThoughtSpace is in collaboration with the Oxford University Press, a department of University of Oxford that furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

An interview with Philippe Cullet, detailing more information about the book and its contents can be read below:

Where would you situate this book in the socio-political landscape?

Sanitation has evinced considerable interest from policy-makers, lawmakers, researchers and even politicians in recent years. Its transformation from a social taboo into a topic of general conversation is evident from the central role of sanitation in recent Bollywood blockbusters, such as Piku (2015), Toilet ek prem katha (2017) and Padman (2018). Toilet ek prem katha is particularly interesting since it directly mirrors the policy framework of the central government that seeks to ensure open defecation free India by 2 October, 2019.

In fact, insofar as policymaking and implementation is concerned, sanitation has emerged from the shadows in the past five years. The Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) has led to the construction of millions of toilets throughout the country. Several states have been declared Open Defecation Free (ODF) in the last couple of years. This is a positive development in terms of emphasising the urgency of addressing the sanitation crisis.

This also fits well with various judicial pronouncements since the 1990s where sanitation has been recognised as a fundamental right derived from the constitutional right to life. Yet, ongoing policy initiatives are not linked to a rights perspective, and a statutory framework to transform the promise of the judicially recognised right to sanitation into reality is absent. For the right to sanitation to be realised, its multiple dimensions must be addressed holistically beyond the instrumental mechanism of constructing toilets.

What would you say is the unique contribution of this book?

This book provides the first comprehensive analysis of the diverse dimensions of the right to sanitation. It exposes the limits of the current framework that lacks mechanisms to ensure the realisation of the right to sanitation in urban and rural areas on a universal basis, while ensuring the realisation of other rights, such as the rights to equality, environment, health and water.

How would you summarise the contents of this book?

As mentioned above, this book addresses the various dimensions of the right to sanitation. The realisation of this right is crucial in itself as well as for ensuring the realisation of various other rights, including the rights to environment, health and water. The book examines and analyses the different law and policy initiatives that have been undertaken to address issues that affect the realisation of the right to sanitation. These initiatives include the construction of toilets to address insanitary conditions, the development of sewerage infrastructure and other measures undertaken to control water pollution and to reuse wastewater, and legislative reforms related to the conditions of work of sanitation workers. Further, this book highlights issues that are not new but are yet to be satisfactorily addressed such as manual scavenging and gender equality, explained in more detail further down in this interview.

You mention at the start that the statutory framework for realising the right to sanitation is absent. Does this mean that there is no legal framework for sanitation?

No, the absence of statutory recognition of the right to sanitation does not mean that there is a complete void. There are various legal instruments that address some specific aspects of sanitation but there is no comprehensive sanitation legislation and what exists is not framed around a rights perspective.

In certain cases, there has been a clear legal framework, such as the one calling for the eradication of manual scavenging that has been in existence for decades. Yet, this has not been enough to ensure its complete elimination perhaps because of the deep link between the practice of manual scavenging and caste. In addition, the all too frequent news of sanitation workers dying in the sewers dispels the impression that we are any closer to the elimination of all practices amounting to manual scavenging.

Further, the gender dimension of sanitation has often been instrumentalised in government interventions. For instance, protection of the dignity of women was presented as the primary rationale for construction of toilets in official campaigns for behaviour change until 2017 when sufficient pressure led to a specific acknowledgment that this was problematic in policy documents, hopefully leading to a change on the ground.

Does this book have international and comparative relevance?

Yes, this book has relevance in international and comparative contexts. It will contribute to the ongoing discourse on the right to sanitation at the international level. The conditions, concerns and challenges in India may be similar to situations in other developing and least developed countries. Therefore, the book contributes to reimagining the right to sanitation from the perspective of the global South.

It does so in particular through its mix of conceptual work and grounded research, with a number of the book’s chapters being based on extensive ground-level work in the states of Kerala, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh.

About the editors 

Philippe Cullet, Sujith Koonan and Lovleen Bhullar are the editors of Right to Sanitation in India: Critical Perspectives. Philippe Cullet is Professor of International and Environmental Law at SOAS University of London and a Senior Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi. Sujith Koonan teaches at Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. Lovleen Bhullar holds a PhD in law from SOAS University of London, and is associated with Environmental Law Research Society, New Delhi.

The book can be accessed at OUP India, here.

The book can be accessed at OUP global, here.

Tilting at Titling: Will We Ever Get it Right?

A TALK BY DEEPAK SANAN
RIGHTS

Incomplete and inconclusive land titling in India poses serious challenges to the conduct of business, and often creates situations of injustice by facilitating dispossession and displacement. This leads to disputed ownership with many cases under litigation for decades.

Listen to the talk (above) by Deepak Sanan where he reviews the reasons for such infirmities in land titles in India, and also explains how the government typically deals with these. He particularly highlights why the government’s approach is insufficient to deal with the issue systematically.

The United States and India: Forging an Indispensable Democratic Partnership

FULL VIDEO OF REPORT RELEASE AND DISCUSSION
INTERNATIONAL POLITICS

Watch the full video (above) of the release of the report and a discussion with the co-chairs of the Center for American Progress Task Force on U.S.-India Relations – Ambassadors Nirupama Rao and Rich Verma, moderated by Ashok Malik – on the future of the U.S.-India relationship, organised by the Centre for Policy Research in collaboration with the Center for American Progress.

The relationship between India and the United States has become an important priority for both nations, and is increasingly important to advancing shared interests in global peace, prosperity, and freedom. Over the past year, the Center for American Progress organised a binational group of Indian and American experts in a wide variety of fields to work together to craft a vision for the future of U.S.-India relations.

The resulting task force report – The United States and India: Forging an Indispensable Democratic Partnership – outlines a path forward for the bilateral relationship, along with a series of concrete recommendations that both sides can take to advance shared interests. The report focuses on five key areas: investing in jobs and economic opportunities; building a clean energy future from the bottom up; creating a U.S.-India security advantage in Asia; strengthening democratic institutions at home and around the world; and strengthening ties between Indians and Americans.

Nirupama Rao is co-chair, Center for American Progress Task Force on U.S.-India relations; former Foreign Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, India and former Indian Ambassador to the U.S

Rich Verma is co-chair, Center for American Progress Task Force on U.S.-India relations; Vice Chairman, The Asia Group and former U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of India

Ashok Malik is Press Secretary to the President of India

The question and answer session that followed can be accessed here.

The Uri Response

CPR FACULTY ANALYSE

 

In the wake of the Uri attack from across the border, which left 18 Indian soldiers dead, CPR faculty comment on ways in which India could respond, compiled below:

  • G Parthasarathy writes that isolating Pakistan in South Asia should be India’s major priority, and that India, Afghanistan and Bangladesh could even consider boycotting the next SAARC summit in Islamabad. He advises a calibrated military response by India, ‘while making it clear to Pakistan that any escalation would only cause it more harm’
  • In The Uri Challenge, Pratap Bhanu Mehta analyses the options for India’s response, taking into account the complex nature of the state of Pakistan.
  • Shyam Saran is quoted in the article Response to Uri, where he advocates that India should be more active internationally to exploit Pakistan’s negative image as the ‘epicentre of terror’, especially given that India has several legitimate pressure points.
  • In another article, Securing India’s Borders, Shyam Saran writes on the necessity for India to address her own vulnerabilities in managing her borders, advocating the need for a national security strategy, and suggesting steps towards achieving it.
  • In India must impose measured costs on terror exporters, Brahma Chellaney writes that the Uri attack is a defining moment for Modi. He states that India needs to overhaul its strategy, adopting a comprehensive, pro-active approach towards Pakistan, and choose from ‘a spectrum of unconventional options that no nation will discuss in public’. In a subsequent article, he suggests jettisoning the 1960 Indus Water Treaty to ‘mend Pakistan’s behaviour’.
  • Sanjaya Baru writes that the only long-term, realistic solution to the Kashmir problem is the Musharraf-Manmohan formula, and it needs to be revisited.
  • In a debate on NDTV (above), G Parthasarathy comments that while ‘retribution’ was justified, it was necessary to proceed with good sense, and the time had come to increase diplomatic pressure on Pakistan, especially in SAARC.
  • In an interview with LiveMint, Srinath Raghavan discusses the need to improve India’s security systems to deter Pakistan sponsored terror.